ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Describir la prevalencia de diagnóstico autorreportado de asma, comorbilidades, patrones de tratamiento y calidad de vida (CdV) autopercibida en la población chilena, utilizando datos de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud (ENS) de 2016-2017. Métodos: Se analizó la población de la ENS 2016-2017 con ≥ 15 años. Los individuos con asma fueron identificados por autorreporte. Se evaluaron variables sociodemográficas, CdV y salud (autopercepción y/o EQ-5D-3L), estado nutricional, comorbilidades y patrón de tratamiento. Resultados: La prevalencia de asma fue de 5,4% (IC 95%: 4,5-6,5). Se reportó una frecuencia casi 2 veces mayor de CdV autopercibida (6,3% [IC 95%: 3,4-11,3] frente a 3,6% [IC 95%: 2,8-4,5]) y de salud (16,4% [IC 95%: 11,4-23,1] frente a 7,7% [IC 95%: 6,6-8,9]) muy mala/mala/menos que regular en el grupo con asma en comparación con el total de individuos de la ENS. El grupo de asma tuvo mayor frecuencia de al menos algunos problemas en todos los dominios EQ-5D-3L. La comorbilidad más frecuente fue la sintomatología depresiva. El 63% de los encuestados que reconocían tener asma no recibían ningún tratamiento en el momento de la encuesta. Con mayor frecuencia el tratamiento para el asma fue prescrito por un médico general (62,4%/55,4%, medicación de rescate/controlador) y el acceso fue a través del sistema público (65,9%/82,5%, medicación de rescate/controlador). Alrededor de un tercio de la población utilizaba monoterapia con SABA (32,8%). Conclusión: La prevalencia de asma fue del 5,4% y los asmáticos relataron peor CdV y salud. Se observó una baja tasa de tratamiento y de los tratados la mayoría usaba solo medicación de rescate.
Objective: To describe diagnosed asthma prevalence, self-reported comorbidities, treatment patterns and self-perceived quality of life (QoL) in Chilean population, using National Health Survey (NHS) data from 2016-2017. Methods: 2016-2017 NHS population aged ≥ 15 years was analyzed. Asthma individuals were identified by self-report. Sociodemographic variables, QoL and health (self-perception and/or EQ-5D-3L), nutritional status, comorbidities and treatment pattern were evaluated. Results: Asthma prevalence was 5.4% (95% CI: 4.5-6.5). Compared with NHS total individuals, asthma group showed almost 2 times higher frequency of self-perceived QoL (6.3% [95% CI: 3.4-11.3] vs 3.6% [95% CI: 2.8-4.5]) and health (16.4% [95% CI: 11.4-23.1] vs 7.7% [95% CI: 6.6-8.9]) named as very bad/bad/less than regular. In addition, asthma group had a greater frequency of at least some problems in all EQ-5D-3L domains. Depressive symptoms were the most frequently observed comorbidity. 63% of respondents who acknowledged having asthma were not receiving any treatment at the time of the survey. Asthma treatment was most frequently prescribed by a general physician (62.4%/55.4%, rescue/controller medication) and the access occurs in the public system (65.9%/82.5%, rescue/controller medication). About one third of the population used SABA monotherapy (32.8%). Conclusion: Asthma prevalence was 5.4% and asthmatics reported worse QoL and health. A very low treatment rate was observed and those treated, most were under rescue medication.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Asthma/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/therapy , Tobacco Use Disorder , Comorbidity , Chile/epidemiology , Nutritional Status , Prevalence , Health Surveys , Self Report , Sociodemographic FactorsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objectives: To determine the trend of self-reported asthma diagnosed prevalence and to describe the factors associated with asthma in Brazilian adults. Method: Epidemiological cross-sectional study based on databases analysis from three national household surveys: Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios (PNAD) 2003, PNAD 2008 and Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde (PNS) 2013. Participants between 18-45 years old were included. Trend analysis of asthma diagnosed prevalence was conducted using a logistic general linear model. A hierarchical logistic regression model was used to select factors significantly associated with asthma prevalence. Results: Asthma diagnosed prevalence was 3.6% (2003), 3.7% (2008) and 4.5% (2013), showing a statistically significant increased trend. Asthma diagnosed prevalence also increased when analysed by gender (annual change for men: 2.47%, p < 0.003; women: 2.16%, p < 0.001), urban area (annual change for urban: 2.15%, p < 0.001; rural: 2.69%, p = 0.072), healthcare insurance status (annual change without healthcare insurance: 2.18%, p < 0.001; with healthcare insurance: 1.84%, p = 0.014), and geographic regions (annual change North: 4.68%, p < 0.001; Northeast: 4.14%, p < 0.001; and Southeast: 1.84%, p = 0.025). Female gender, obesity, living in urban areas and depression were associated with asthma diagnosed prevalence. Discussion: PNAD and PNS surveys allow for a very large, representative community-based sample of the Brazilian adults to investigate the asthma prevalence. From 2003 to 2013, the prevalence of self-reported physician diagnosis of asthma increased, especially in the North and Northeast regions. Gender, region of residence, household location (urban/rural), obesity, and depression diagnosis seem to play significant roles in the epidemiology of asthma in Brazil.
RESUMO Objetivos: Determinar a tendência da prevalência de diagnóstico de asma autorreferida e descrever os fatores associados à asma em adultos brasileiros. Método: Estudo transversal de análise de dados de três pesquisas domiciliares nacionais: Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios (PNAD) 2003, PNAD 2008 e Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde (PNS) 2013. Participantes entre 18 e 45 anos foram incluídos. A análise de tendência da prevalência do diagnóstico de asma foi realizada utilizando modelo logístico linear. Aplicou-se o modelo de regressão logística hierárquico para selecionar fatores significativamente associados à prevalência de asma. Resultados: A prevalência do diagnóstico de asma foi de 3,6% (2003), 3,7% (2008) e 4,5% (2013), apresentando tendência de elevação significativa. A prevalência do diagnóstico de asma também se elevou quando analisada por sexo (variação anual entre homens: 2,47%, p < 0,003; mulheres: 2,16%, p < 0,001), área urbana (variação anual: 2,15% p < 0,001), plano de saúde (variação anual sem plano: 2,18%, p < 0,001; com plano: 1,84%, p = 0,014) e regiões geográficas (variação anual Norte: 4,68%, p < 0,001; Nordeste 4,14%, p < 0,001; e Sudeste 1,84%, p = 0,025). Sexo feminino, obesidade, viver em áreas urbanas e depressão foram associados positivamente com a prevalência de diagnóstico de asma. Discussão: PNAD e PNS são bases populacionais representativas de adultos brasileiros que possibilitam a investigação da prevalência de asma. De 2003 a 2013, a prevalência de diagnóstico autorreferido de asma aumentou, especialmente nas regiões Norte e Nordeste. Sexo, região geográfica e área de residência (urbana/rural), obesidade e diagnóstico de depressão parecem desempenhar papéis significativos na epidemiologia da asma no Brasil.